| Sight of Grace | |||||||||
| Brazil
1980 | Ethiopia 1984 | Mali
1985 | Korem 1984 | Brazil
1983 about us | about Sebastião Salgado | about the book | discussion | links | home |
|||||||||
|
Pornography
When I look at this photograph a wave of emotions comes over me. I feel pity, sadness, hate, hope, wonder, and some things I can't describe. I've learned a lot from this picture about the battles of being human and I'm so thankful that I had the opportunity to view it. But sadly, in many situations where this picture could be a huge benefit and teaching tool it wouldn't be shown because the boy in the picture is nude. Why is our country so afraid of nudity? Nudity is taboo in this country and I think that to a certain degree some of that needs to be erased. Now I'm not saying break out the Playboys, but I am saying that a powerful photograph such as this one should not be hidden simply because it shows a naked young boy. It shows so much more than that. It shows a starving young boy; a boy who has wanted food more than we ever have. It shows a proud young man; one who holds his head high and looks the world in the face despite his desperate situation. This boy has probably suffered more in his life then most of us would care to imagine. When we look at this photograph we not only ask questions about the boy, but also about our lives and ourselves. We could build awareness of the troubles in other cultures by looking at a picture like this. If I would have studied this photograph in high school I think that it would have really humbled me, knocked me off that high horse I was on.
So
why aren't pictures such as this one put on the commercials with the good
Samaritan holding a small, under-privileged child asking you to send just
$0.95 a day? Because he is nude, and to some that would be
offensive. Some might say it's child pornography. But
my
opinion is that those people might claim that a photograph such as this is
pornography simply because it shows frontal nudity of a young boy.
But this just isn't so. I bet that some of these people don't think twice
when they see a half-naked young man modeling underwear, or a swimsuit
model stretched out on the beach in a provocative pose. And I bet
that some don't bat an eyelash when their teenage daughter has a poster in
her bedroom of a shirtless teen idol. So why would this picture from
the pages of "An Uncertain Grace" not be pornographic and the
photo of the model be more so? Even though the young boy has on less
clothes than the woman in the swimsuit, the message is different, and I
think that is the determining factor. The underwear models are
partially clothed, but way more pornographic than the little boy standing
in the desert. The U.S. Justice department says that in order for
something to be considered pornographic it has to meet the following
criteria: it must focus on the genital area, mush show unnatural
These pictures have been taken from the following places: The small boy is from page 66 of "An Uncertain Grace" Victoria's Secret. 28 May 2001. <http://www2.victoriassecret.com/proddisplay/?prnbr=69-143634&cgname=OSSWMTMBZZZ>. Toccafondi, David. Calvin Klein Ads: unofficial archives. 28 May 2001. <http://pobox.upenn.edu/~davidtoc/images/ck.briefs1.jpg>. |
|||||||||